Libgtk-3.so.0: Cannot Open Shared Object File: No Such File Or Directory
Comment 48 Mike Hommey [:glandium] 2012-12-07 01:32:18 PST The GNU extension in question is there since glibc 2.11 (which debian squeeze has) Comment 49 Mike Hommey [:glandium] 2012-12-07 01:46:55 PST Taking With the "wrong" dependents.list file in place for thunderbird 13 (see bug 762621), LD_DEBUG=libs output ends up showing: XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /local/i586/thunderbird/libxpcom.so: libxul.so: cannot open shared object file: No such Please direct your discussion to one of our mailing lists. Browse other questions tagged rhel libraries dynamic-linking or ask your own question. http://outwardsound.com/cannot-open/error-while-loading-shared-libraries-libgl-so-1-cannot-open-shared-object-file.html
hint, don't do that. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Thomas Eriksson at Nov 14, 2014 at 8:06 pm ⇧ On 11/14/2014 12:02 PM, Larry Martell wrote:On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Erikssonwrote:On 11/14/2014 11:46 AM, Larry Martell Comment 78 Andreas Glaeser 2013-03-21 09:09:14 PDT *** Bug 851555 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Comment 79 Folco 2013-05-08 12:38:24 PDT I get the same issue When I perform Desktop/firefox # ./firefox, i get: error while loading shared libraries: libdbus-1.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or director.
Libgtk-3.so.0: Cannot Open Shared Object File: No Such File Or Directory
Should I allow my child to make an alternate meal if they do not like anything served at mealtime? Any issues with builds received from your distribution's package manager should be reported to your distribution's bug tracker or support channels. Thanks for telling. Anyoneknow how I can do that?
Join our community today! There are two related problems here resulting in people getting the wrong version of firefox which results in them thinking that there is a software bug in it. Failing that maybe support.mozilla.org documentation may be improved to cover this point. Libgtk-3.so.0: Cannot Open Shared Object File: No Such File Or Directory Couldn't Load Xpcom. Comment 75 Rene L. 2013-02-05 01:25:05 PST (In reply to Gustavo Homem from comment #74) > The problem happens with Firefox 18.0.1 x64 on a Mandriva 2009.1 x64 based > system
Anyoneknow how I can do that? Comment 87 Gustavo Homem 2013-05-10 10:30:18 PDT Sometimes factors are factors, other times factors are mere circumstances (ex: developer X upgraded build env to latest and greatest). Unless of course you want to go outside of their supported builds which I then recommend the same websites mentioned earlier. On top of the all the waysthey've been screwing up the interface for a while now it was the finalstraw.--Steve reply | permalink Larry Martell This is not about my browsing,
Comment 92 Zilmar 2014-03-13 06:52:25 PDT (In reply to zilmar.jr from comment #91) > (In reply to marco-ontour from comment #90) > > I installed the libdbus-glib-1-2 package for firefox 24.0a1 Libasound.so.2: Cannot Open Shared Object File: No Such File Or Directory I get the same errors. share|improve this answer answered Sep 14 '14 at 4:30 Michael Petch 13.2k42454 centos 7. Not glib?
Libdbus-glib-1.so.2: Cannot Open Shared Object File: No Such File Or Directory
It resulted in Gnome crashing and since then I am presented with the message"error while loading shared libraries: libdbus-1.so.3 cannot open shared object files: no such file or directory"Attempts to redo What could be the resolution for this issue ? Libgtk-3.so.0: Cannot Open Shared Object File: No Such File Or Directory I feel it's my duty to direct people to the best place to get the help they need. Libdbus Glib 1 So 2 Cannot Open Shared Object File No Such File Or Directory Couldn T Load Xpcom Larry Martell at Nov 14, 2014 at 9:13 pm ⇧ On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Eriksson wrote:On 11/14/2014 12:22 PM, Larry Martell wrote:On Fri, Nov 14, 2014
A showstopper regression like that *within* an ESR series is not good. http://outwardsound.com/cannot-open/word-cannot-open-the-file-because-the-file-format-does-not-match-the-file-extension.html I see what happened - I downloadedboth, but both times I un-tarred the same file (the 32 bit one). rhel libraries dynamic-linking share|improve this question edited Jan 13 '12 at 5:55 asked Jan 10 '12 at 9:18 Dungeon Hunter 128116 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up I would be doing you a disservice to suggest otherwise or to ignore cries for help altogether. > There are two related problems here resulting in people getting the wrong > Libgio-2.0.so.0: Cannot Open Shared Object File: No Such File Or Directory
Larry Martell at Nov 14, 2014 at 8:21 pm ⇧ On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 03:11:48PM -0500, Larry Martell wrote:Try What version do your binutils report (try nm --version). Should someone open a bug to that effect, or discover one that is already open perhaps they will note that in a comment here. his comment is here Did a thief think he could conceal his identity from security cameras by putting lemon juice on his face?
hint,don't do that.This is not for browsing, it's about running live server testswith selenium. Libdbus-glib-1-2 Comment 94 lorenzo.decarli 2014-04-09 11:03:44 PDT I confirm that this bug persists on RHEL 6. The problem looked like a simple case of dependencies that somehow did not get handled properly by the package manager.
Q&A means "Question and Answer".
Running CentOS 6.3 x86_64 with all necessary i686 libs installed. Would this be a good approach and, if so, which ones should be removed? And this note can be useful for other people experiencing the 17-ESR distro from downloads.mozilla.org doesn't work out-of-the-box. Xpcomglueload Error For File Opt Firefox Libmozgtk So I think it would it would be worth documenting this so that users don't come to this bug report thinking this bug isn't fixed.
Comment 98 pvelkovski 2014-04-09 17:36:13 PDT lorenzo.decarli I've hit this bug once on Ubuntu 12.04 (and hadn't bothered to unsubscrive from the bug), only to realise that from all the existing Compiled FF10.1 myself though and this release does work fine. I am seeing the "libdbus-glib-1.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory" error with Firefox 29b06 (latest beta as of today). weblink Basically, I removed a bunch of libraries: $ diff -rq firefox-13.0.1-cy* Only in firefox-13.0.1-cy/lib/firefox: libfreebl3.chk Only in firefox-13.0.1-cy/lib/firefox: libfreebl3.so Only in firefox-13.0.1-cy/lib/firefox: libnss3.so Only in firefox-13.0.1-cy/lib/firefox: libnssckbi.so Only in firefox-13.0.1-cy/lib/firefox: libnssdbm3.chk
I want to see if it's due to the different version. Please reopen if this remains broken for you using Firefox 17.0.2esr. Comment 69 Thorsten Glaser 2013-01-10 00:12:31 PST Mh, I think that’s fair. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Comment 72 Stefan 2013-01-27 14:53:14 PST (In reply to Bastiaan Welmers from comment #71) > After running: > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/firefox:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib /opt/firefox/firefox > everything works. > Seems it has triggered /opt/firefox/*.so to be rsx11m Moderator Posts: 14327Joined: May 3rd, 2007, 7:40 amLocation: US Posted March 18th, 2011, 8:08 pm Glad to hear that you've got it working, but strange anyway. I don't think it's very productive having these discussions on a "fixed" bug. Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
share|improve this answer answered Nov 16 '15 at 15:43 starfry 1,83311732 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign That is why I suggest going to support.mozilla.org, or the respective distribution's support channel, if that seems appropriate. What is your distro? (and yes, I do expect glibc 2.10 to be failing. You need to make sure that programs and libraries are built with compatible architecture types To tell if a program or shared object is built as 32 and 64 bit you
Comment 85 Gustavo Homem 2013-05-10 09:30:19 PDT @Mike, Anthony, There are people running older distributions under controled conditions, doing their own security updates. Theywere downloaded with the same name and wget put (1) on the second one,but I didn't notice that. Not least of which is our ability to maintain a minimum viable product on aging technology and the number of users potentially affected by a de-support. The machine the tests have been running on had FF24.3.0 and it died.
I would have done it myself, but I have no idea where specificaly I should do it, as the categories offerted on this page https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi are not really related to the Comment 12 Gordon Lack 2012-06-13 11:39:03 PDT FYI: This bug is a duplicate of bug 762621 Comment 13 Philip Chee 2012-06-13 20:20:08 PDT > FYI: This bug is a duplicate of