Fsck Unable To Resolve Label
Installed Gutsy Tribe 5 Ubuntu on sda1. Jerry jerrylamos (jerrylamos) wrote on 2007-09-06: #18 fstab from Kubuntu on sda5 Edit (750 bytes, text/plain) Here's blkid's from Kubuntu Tribe 5 sda5 [email protected]:~$ blkid /dev/sda1 /dev/sda1: UUID="9e6ffe2f-67d9-4c74-8d47-0f17044d1fb1" SEC_TYPE="ext2" TYPE="ext3" [email protected]:~$ Feisty is going to have a problem every time I install another build in a different partition, since it uses UUID's and not /dev's. Ubuntu development doesn't want to fix the problem, dump it onto the user. navigate here
That wasn't the case in 5.10 when this was first implemented. ServerBuddies Support Blog Linux Support Blog Home | serverbuddies.com Find Fsck.ext3: Unable to resolve UUID Fsck.ext3: Unable to resolve UUID If you are getting the FSCK error fsck.ext3: Unable to resolve Will the same 'mount' command syntax also work for 'e2fsck'? Tango Icons © Tango Desktop Project.
Fsck Unable To Resolve Label
The Feisty /etc/fstab still had the UUID from the removed drive, so fsck couldn't find that one either. For whatever reason, when I install another Ubuntu into an existing triple boot system, swap UUID's have not been a problem to fsck. Thank you, Craig A. As I said in my previous post, I think my preference is to stop automounting altogether and recommend that new users use the point-and-click desktop facilities rather than explaining how to
It's gone on way too long. Learn more about Red Hat subscriptions Product(s) Red Hat Enterprise Linux Category Troubleshoot Tags file_systems Quick Links Downloads Subscriptions Support Cases Customer Service Product Documentation Help Contact Us Log-in Assistance Accessibility I've been doing command line (or even machine code) for over 40 years but my mistake rate is higher on command line than point and click. Mount Can't Find Uuid We are going to stick with UUIDs because the kernel has a fun habit of changing device names every so often.
Where in the Ubuntu instructions or in Install does it then say, "formatting this partition changes the UUID so you have to manually edit any other fstab's to match, otherwise the Fsck Unable To Resolve Uuid Centos You will lose any data you have stored on that partition!". Craig A. This blog will focus on new kernel features, Review of the best opensource software and news.
jerrylamos (jerrylamos) wrote on 2007-08-31: #13 The bug: Gutsy Tribe 5 Just hit this "fsck.ext3 unable to resolve UUID= 4a60babf....... "fsck.ext3 unable to resolve UUID = 15251c65 .... Fsck Repair A year ago I didn't have this problem since fstab used hda1, hda3, hda5. The file is removed after that automatically. The solution, as described in the fsck man page was to make sure that there was 0 in the 6th field of fstab, rather than non-zero. (The 6th field specified the
Fsck Unable To Resolve Uuid Centos
Sharing swap used to be trivial, now it involves, (with each distro that has errm, progressed to using UUID's) going into each one's /etc/fstab and changing the UUID to /dev/sdX, again You've got choices like: 1. Fsck Unable To Resolve Label However ... Fsck.ext4 Unable To Resolve Label I don't recall the swap ever being a problem on boot.
Point and click for new users or even old ones is fine. check over here And again the next install a few days later. On this three boot system, there's one swap partition that is used by whichever Ubuntu I'm booting at the moment. What is it under Kubuntu, Kate? System Halts During Boot With Fsck Ext4 Unable To Resolve Uuid Error
Personally I have no problem with making a directory on /media and mounting /dev/sd whatever when I need to. When I boot, grub says it cannot resolve the UUID It shows me UUID "A" b423d14d-.... It is not an e2fsprogs bug, but, as described above it is an Ubuntu installer issue. his comment is here Cheers, Jerry Richard Birnie (rbirnie-deactivatedaccount) wrote on 2007-04-17: #4 fstab for sda5 Edit (786 bytes, text/plain) I am experiencing this bug with Kubuntu i386 20070417.
Could it be that the programmer(s) that wrote the UUID code to keep changing the UUID's did not provide for installing more than one Ubuntu Linux on a system, and did I think I can do all I need if Places Network or something similar found the other file systems that are not needed for boot. fsck.ext3: Unable to resolve 'LABEL=/boot' freshmeat Using Fedora 1 16th November 2006 06:10 AM Getting Error "fsck.ext3 Unable to resolve 'LABEL=boot'" during Booting of FC 4 salil.mehta Installation, Upgrades and Live
Register All Albums FAQ Today's Posts Search Using Fedora General support for current versions.
Example on this system Tribes 1 & 2 did, Tribe 4 wouldn't install and botched up the partition, but I had a partition with Tribe 2 to fall back on. All working just fine and /home happily shared between edgy and feisty. But, short of fixing the Ubuntu installer not do dumb things such as greadily including other root filesystems for other Linux installs in /etc/fstab by default... You can use heuristics, of course, but heuristics are often incorrect.
So, today, I went looking for a bug report on the problem, and discovered the above long list of bugs, comments, and possible solutions. Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: NYC Posts: 8,129 Sometimes, one can fix such things by, rather than using label, go back to the old way of using /dev/sdaX, where X is For the next bunch of Ubuntu tribes or eggs or flights whatever they are, maybe I'll remember to go into the existing /etc/fstab's and comment out the test partition. weblink Yes, I understand that the problem could be hard if it were handled solely by a program.
I noticed that if I ran blkid, it would NOT show /dev/hdd. I'm also experiencing this problem, I upgraded a 6.10 release and startup recognizes one of three partitions. Eddy (tyche-deactivatedaccount) wrote on 2007-11-13: #27 I am an inexperienced user. i.e., if /dev/sda1 is your Tribe1 install, and /dev/sda2 is your Tribe2 install, and you are installing /dev/sda3 with Tribe 3, you DON'T want to put /dev/sda1 and /dev/sda2 in Tribe
I'd actually done something right. This should at least enable you to boot your system until you find out what the problem with the UUIDs actually is. __________________ Asus Eee PC 901, 2GB RAM, 20GB SSD When I check /etc/fstab I see that it is the UUID for /home. Format changes the UUID, example Gutsy Tribe 6 install into sda1 of a three boot system: Before install /dev/sda1: UUID="9e6ffe2f-67d9-4c74-8d47-0f17044d1fb1" SEC_TYPE="ext2" TYPE="ext3" After install /dev/sda1: UUID="f23f7c06-5228-4b6e-8103-0adbc524f920" SEC_TYPE="ext2" TYPE="ext3" Further muddying the
check your installation. It seems like this is a problem everyone will encounter if they format any of the partitions which are automaticaly mounted through fstab.